Thursday, April 19, 2007

U.S. to cut off Baghdad neighborhood with barrier: LA Times

Commanders hope the wall will prevent attacks on the Sunni Arab districts it surrounds.
By Edmund Sanders, Times Staff Writer
7:39 PM PDT, April 19, 2007

Map
Related Stories
-
-
BAGHDAD -- A U.S. military brigade is constructing a three-mile-long concrete wall to cut off one of the capital's most restive Sunni Arab districts from the Shiite Muslim neighborhoods that surround it, raising concern about the further Balkanization of Iraq's most populous and violent city.

U.S. commanders in northern Baghdad say the 12-foot-high barrier will make it more difficult for suicide bombers, death squads and militia fighters from sectarian factions to attack one another and slip back to their home turf. Construction began last week and is expected to be completed by the end of the month.

Although Baghdad is replete with blast walls, checkpoints and other temporary barriers, including a massive wall around the Green Zone, the wall being constructed in Adhamiya would be the first to essentially divide a neighborhood by sect.

A largely Sunni district, Adhamiya is one of Baghdad's flashpoints, avoided by not only Shiites, but Sunni outsiders. The area is almost completely surrounded by Shiite-dominated districts.

The ambitious project is a sign of how far the U.S. military will go to end the non-stop bloodshed in Iraq. But U.S. officials said the barrier is not a central tactic of the ongoing U.S.-Iraqi security crackdown announced Feb. 13.

"We defer to commanders on the ground, but dividing up the entire city with barriers is not part of the plan," U.S. military spokesman Lt. Col. Christopher Garver said Thursday.

News of the barrier construction was first reported Thursday by the newspaper Stars and Stripes.

Sunnis and Shiites living in the shadow of the barrier are united in their contempt for the imposing new structure.

"Are they trying to divide us into different sectarian cantons?" said a Sunni drugstore owner in Adhamiya, who identified himself as Abu Ahmed, 44. "This will deepen the sectarian strife and only serve to abort efforts aimed at reconciliation."

Some of Ahmed's customers come from Shiite or mixed neighborhoods that are now cut off by large barriers along a main highway. Customers and others seeking to cross into the Sunni district must park their cars outside Adhamiya, walk through a narrow pedestrian passage in the walls and catch taxis on the other side.

Several residents interviewed likened the project to the massive barriers built around some Palestinians zones in Israel.

"Are we in the West Bank?" asked Abu Qusay, 48, a pharmacist who said that access to his favorite kebab restaurant in Adhamiya has been cut off.

Residents complained that Baghdad has already been dissected by hundreds of barriers that cause daily traffic snarls.

Some predicted the new wall would become a target of militants on both sides. Last week, construction crews came under small-arms fire, military officials said.

"I feel this is the beginning of a pattern of what the whole of Iraq is going to look like, divided by sectarian and racial criteria," said Abu Marwan, 50, a Shiite pharmacist.

Marwan lives on a predominantly Shiite side of the wall, but works in the Sunni district.

Najim Sadoon, 51, worried he will lose customers at his housewares store. "This closure of the street will have severe economic hardships," he said. "Transportation fees will increase. Customers who used to come here in their cars will now prefer to go other places."

Majid Fadhil, 43, a Shiite police commissioner in a neighborhood north of the wall, said flatly, "This fence is not going to work."

Pentagon officials first broached the idea of creating "gated communities" earlier this year.

But more recently, military officials have emphasized political negotiation as well as heightened troop presence as a way to stem sectarian conflict.

On a tour of the Middle East this week, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates repeatedly struck chords of unity and reconciliation. He is expected to meet with sectarian leaders and government officials in Baghdad on Friday.

The construction in Adhamiya is not the first time U.S. military planners have attempted to isolate hostile regions. In 2005, U.S. troops tried to surround the Sunni-dominated city of Samarra with earthen berms to prevent insurgents from entering and leaving the city. A similar strategy was deployed to contain Tall Afar. Experiments with less extensive walls and trenches have also been attempted in Baghdad and Kirkuk.

The latest project is the work of the 407th Brigade Support Battalion, part of the 82nd Airborne Division, based in northern Baghdad's Camp Taji. Since April 10, soldiers have ventured out almost nightly after curfew, overseeing installation of the 14,000-pound wall segments, using giant construction cranes and employing Iraqi crews, said Army Sgt. Michael Pryor, a public affairs specialist for the unit.

Soldiers have dubbed the project the "The Great Wall of Adhamiya." Commanders in the 82nd Airborne could not be reached for comment Thursday. In a news release earlier this week, military officials said the project was intended to protect citizens on both sides.

"(The wall) is on a fault line of Sunni and Shia, and the idea is to curb some of the self-sustaining violence by controlling who has access to the neighborhoods," Army Capt. Marc Sanborn, brigade engineer for the project, said in the release.

A special correspondent in Baghdad contributed to this report.
Comment: When will these fascist gringos learn that walls cannot stop internal insurgency in occupied territory when real basic humane rights issues remain unaddressed by the Amerikan military occupation in Iraq??? ~Peta


Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Read: Militarizing the Border

Gracias, the article online @ http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4146

IRC <communications@irc-online.org> wrote:

FPIF Column

Militarizing the Border
Frida Berrigan | April 12, 2007
Editor: John Feffer, IRC

Email this page to a friend
Comment on this article
Foreign Policy In Focus
The sun was strong and so was the rhetoric, as President George W. Bush headed to Yuma, Arizona on April 9 to tackle the problem of illegal immigration. Flanked by uniformed border agents, national guardsmen and members of local law enforcement whose stiff formality emphasized his bare-armed enthusiasm, the president asserted that "securing the border is a critical part of a strategy for comprehensive immigration reform… Congress is going to take up the legislation on immigration. It is a matter of national interest and it's a matter of deep conviction for me."
The president rolled up his shirt sleeves and blamed a host of problems on illegal immigration: it "puts pressure on the public schools and the hospitals… drains the state and local budgets… brings crime to our communities." He also urged Congress to get behind a tangle of proposals ranging from more border patrols and a guest worker program to stiffer penalties for illegal immigrants and the people who employ them. But the heart of President Bush's effort against illegal immigration is the multi-billion dollar Secure Border Initiative (SBI).

As with so many other pressing issues -- from terrorism to oil dependency -- the White House is turning to the military industrial complex for a solution. SBI is the plan of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to erect a "virtual fence" of monitors, sensors, unmanned planes, and communications to help border agents catch illegal immigrants crossing the southern border.

In September 2006, DHS awarded initial contracts -- worth upwards of $2 billion -- for the high-tech surveillance technology along border region to weapons giant Boeing. The Chicago-based manufacturer beat out rivals Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman to gain a foothold in the lucrative realm of homeland security. Boeing was the Pentagon's second largest contractor in 2006 with $20.3 billion in deals and now finds itself well positioned to receive the billions in contracts that DHS is doling out. It leads a team of more than half a dozen companies developing and deploying a network of advanced systems that could -- if it all works and is funded -- give DHS patrols a clear picture of everything that moves across almost 2,000 miles of border territory.

What is missing is a clear picture of exactly how many billions it will cost. Last November, Richard Skinner, the inspector general of DHS told lawmakers that estimates for this advanced surveillance network are all over the map: from the low end of $2 billion to a high of between $8 billion to $30 billion. Skinner testified that "our frustration right now is that we don't know what it's going to cost. We just don't know what the big picture is."

DHS answered that frustration with the Secure Border Strategic Plan the following month, stressing that "it expects to complete the SBI investment need to gain control of the Southwest land border by the end of FY 2011, although we certainly expect to gain substantial control of the border prior to that time." The report put the estimate of total costs for equipment, logistics, and manpower at $7.6 billion though 2011. But, the Department admits it "does not as yet have a wholly satisfactory methodology of determining whether a portion of the border is considered under control."

In Yuma, President Bush praised the personnel patrolling the border, but he saved rapturous prose for the Predator drone, a $40 million piece of hardware. "When I landed here at the airport, the first thing I saw was an unmanned aerial vehicle. It's a sophisticated piece of equipment. You can fly it from inside a truck and you can look at people moving at night. It's the most sophisticated technology we have and it's down here on the border to help the border patrol agents do their job."

At a January 2006 briefing, Deputy Secretary Michael Jackson told contractors interested in Homeland Security business, "We're asking you to come back and tell us how to do our business." Now Boeing has come back with its answer -- give us the money and don't think too much.

Luckily, some members of Congress are not accepting that. Henry Waxman (D-CA), the Chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and his staff are looking into the issue of contractor oversight, pointing out that "60 of the 98 people overseeing the border project are contractors." A February 8 memo from his staff alleged that "at least one contractor hired to engage in contract oversight on the border project -- Booz Allen Hamilton -- may have a conflict of interest with Boeing" and suggested that because the technology consulting firm has teamed up with Boeing on a number of other contracts, it cannot provide effective and impartial oversight. Booz Allen Hamilton executives rejected this suggestion.

DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff, in a press conference following President Bush's speech, was quick to assert the Secure Border Initiative's judicious use of resources: "We're not just going to say, 'Oh, this looks like some neat stuff, let's buy it and then put it on the border.'" However, a look at some of the systems military contractors are proposing demonstrates that "buying neat stuff" is exactly what may happen.

For 2008, the president is requesting $46.4 billion in funding for DHS, an 8% increase over 2007.

And with President Bush's belated focus on border security and immigration reform, it is likely that more money will be spent in a hurry. In border security, a new focus on high-tech solutions follows on a wave of failure and money wasted. A $425 million system of cameras and sensors was installed improperly and never worked effectively, and a $6.8 million unmanned aerial vehicle patrolling the border crashed and was destroyed.

In Iraq, military contractors wasted billions of dollars of reconstruction aid. Boeing, meanwhile, is no stranger to corruption scandals: its chief financial officer went to jail in 2005 for wrongdoing in securing Pentagon contracts. To put military contractors, particularly Boeing, in charge of building SBI is a recipe for disaster.

But the issue of militarizing the border goes beyond questions of accountability. In order to craft truly effective, humane and "comprehensive" immigration reform, the president is going to have to do a lot more than show up in his shirtsleeves once in a while. He has to learn that the border is not a war zone, Mexicans are not combatants, and military contractors are not the solution.

FPIF columnist Frida Berrigan is a senior research associate at the New School's World Policy Institute.

Foreign Policy In Focus

Immigration News from FPIF

"A think tank without walls"
http://www.fpif.org/
Introducing the latest policy analysis from Foreign Policy In Focus
Militarizing the Border
By Frida Berrigan

As with so many other pressing issues—from terrorism to oil dependency—the White House is turning to the military industrial complex for help on immigration. The Secure Border Initiative is the Department of Homeland Security's plan to erect a "virtual fence" of monitors, sensors, unmanned planes, and communications to help border agents catch illegal immigrants crossing the southern border.

It's unclear how much SBI will cost. Also, to put military contractors in charge of building this surveillance network, given their record in Iraq and charges of wrongdoing stateside, is a recipe for disaster. But the issue of militarizing the border goes beyond questions of accountability. In order to craft truly effective, humane and "comprehensive" immigration reform, the president must learn that the border is not a war zone, Mexicans are not combatants, and military contractors are not the solution.

FPIF columnist Frida Berrigan is a senior research associate at the New School's World Policy Institute.
See new FPIF article online at:
http://fpif.org/fpiftxt/4146
For media inquiries Emily Schwartz Greco, emily@ips-dc.org, 202-297-5412
Siri Khalsa, media@irc-online.org, 505-388-0208
Produced and distributed by International Relations Center (IRC). For more information, visit http://www.irc-online.org/. If you would like to receive specific topic or regional material from either FPIF (http://www.fpif.org/) or the Americas Program (http://www.americaspolicy.org/), please email: communications@irc-online.org, with "subscribe" in the subject line and giving your area of interest.
If you would like to see IRC's variety of free ezines and listservs , please go to: http://www.irc-online.org/lists/.
To be removed from this list, please reply to this email with "unsubscribe."
Please consider becoming an IRC member or donor. You can join the IRC and make a secure donation by visiting http://www.irc-online.org/donate.php. Thank you.
International Relations Center (IRC)
http://www.irc-online.org/
Siri D. Khalsa
Outreach Coordinator
Email: communications@irc-online.org
PO Box 2178
Silver City, NM 88062
__._,_.___
Monitor: Peter S. Lopez "Peta": sacranative@yahoo.com
List owner: Guillermo Bejarano: aztlannet@yahoo.com
To see and modify all of your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
You can subscribe to three groups:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Aztlannet_Arte
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Aztlannet_News
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Aztlannet_Action
OFFICIAL WEBSITE http://www.NetworkAztlan.com
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
SPONSORED LINKS
Got Yodel?
Give us your best
yodel and win!
Yahoo! Music
Check our Top 10,
and many more.
Yahoo! 360°
Create your page
Share your life
._._,___



Friday, April 13, 2007

Journey for Justice: California Central Valley/Valle Central de California

California Central Valley/Valle Central de California

Journey for Justice

[Jornada por la Justicia]

Journey for Justice Brochure Image Journey for Justice is a ten-day event that begins in Sacramento on April 12, 2007 with Sally Lieber Assembly Speaker pro Tempore taking the first step of more than 300 hundred mile journey involving many people across the central valley.

The spirit of hope and unity the organizers built in 2006 is alive and well. We have seen a growing movement for health care and immigrant rights in the Valley, victories by the homeless in Fresno, and the repudiation of the status quo by voters in November 2006.

However, in spite of these gains, the reality is that the conditions that moved us to action last year are still the same or getting worse. The poor are getting poorer. Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed the Kuehl single payer universal health care bill in 2006, and now more people than ever are without health insurance. Schwarzenegger's 2007 plan would force all Californians to buy expensive insurance policies with deductibles of $5000 or higher for limited coverage.

Despite the 2006 upsurge in our immigrant rights movement, the only legislative result was a 700-mile border wall, and ICE raids are now taking place in Merced, Madera, and throughout the Valley. Police violence and persecution of the homeless has increased, not decreased. California prisons continue to be overcrowded and rapidly expanding, especially in the Valley.

The need for the Journey for Justice is greater than ever. As Rev. Floyd Harris of National Network in Action explained, "We need to educate to motivate, to organize to mobilize, to energize to take communities to a higher level." We need to build committees in every area, leave literature, educate the leaders, and help empower the communities to fight their battles more effectively.

This year we decided on the theme of "Healing our Communities" for Journey for Justice 2007. This focuses our journey on the right to health care, the most sacred of all our economic human rights. Health care is about saving lives, and all human life is sacred. The right to health care brings together all the diverse communities of our Valley and our State. At the same, time it will be the most volatile; hard-fought issue at both the state and national level over the next few years. It will shape the fate of our government itself: will it continue to carry out the interests of insurance, pharmaceutical, and other corporations, or can we reclaim our democracy and force it to do the will of the people?

We will link the Journey for Justice to the statewide One Care Now campaign and Sheila Kuehl's SB 840, as well as to the national struggle to adopt the H.R. 676 single payer universal health care plan. At the same time, we will address broader issues of community well-being: healing from the divisiveness of the anti-immigrant movement, healing from poverty, healing our youth, healing from police violence, healing from the destruction and waste of the prison industrial complex, and healing from environmental wounds.

Our goal is to educate and unite our movement. Unity is not a paper agreement that can be torn up and discarded. It is a living, breathing relationship between peoples with common goals, a unity in spirit. We create it through talking circles, worship services, prayers, forums, and through action. The Journey for Justice is a sacred journey and we urge you to join us.

"Even though I am on dialysis, I have been fully supported by my dialysis center to embark on this journey. The energy I am using to participate is not just for me and my family but all my brothers, sisters, parents and grandparents. It is for all Californians who are not able to receive the level of care that I do." Robert Mansfield (Merced) age 39 on dialysis since July 06.

For more information as the Journey progresses please call statewide coordinator Dr. Salvador Sandoval at (209) 631-6461.

Co-sponsors of the Journey:
  • Centro Bellas Artes, Fresno
  • Comite No Nos Vamos, Fresno
  • Fresno County Peace and Freedom Party
  • National Network in Action, Fresno
  • Merced Labor Party
  • CHAM Deliverance Ministry, San Jose
  • California Poor Peoples Economic Human Rights Campaign
  • Direct Action Anti-Authoritarian Alliance, Modesto
  • Fresno Center for Non-violence
  • Community Alliance, Fresno
Supporters and participants on the Journey:
  • Loaves & Fishes - Stockton
  • Project Voice/ AFSC - Stockton
  • Organization of Farm workers of California -Stockton
  • Association of Immigrants from San Marcos Evangelista, Jalisco - Stockton
  • Association of Braceros of Northern California - Stockton
  • Mexican Honorific Commission - Stockton
  • Dr. Ali Rezapour - Fresno
  • San Joaquin Valley LULAC - Carlos Caberra
  • Reedley Peace Center
  • LUPE - Tulare County
  • Raza Network - Sacramento
  • Zapatistas Network - Sacramento
  • Justice Reform Coalition - Sacramento